高校融入式计算思维训练效果测试与分析

楚雄师范学院学报 ›› 2020, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (3): 125-131.

高校融入式计算思维训练效果测试与分析

史文崇¹, 刘茂华¹, 唐清²

1.河北科技师范学院数学与信息科技学院,河北秦皇岛 066004;
2.河北科技大学信息科学与工程学院,河北石家庄 050700

收稿日期:2018-09-15 出版日期:2020-05-20 发布日期:2020-12-28
作者简介:史文崇(1965-),男,硕士,河北科技师范学院数学与信息科技学院副教授,研究方向:社会计算,高等教育,计算思维。E-mail:mr_shi_pb@126.com

Testing and Analyzing the Effect of the Infused Computational Thinking Instruction in University

SHI Wenchong, LIU Maohua, TANG Qing

1. School of Mathematics and Information Science & Technology,Hebei Normal University of Science &Technology,Qinhuangdao,Hebei Province 066004;
2. School of Information Science and Engineering,Hebei University of Science and Technology,Shijiazhuang,Hebei Province 050700

Received:2018-09-15 Online:2020-05-20 Published:2020-12-28

摘要/Abstract

摘要： “计算思维”提出后,国际社会纷纷开展计算思维教育探索,在中小学的针对性训练中,形成了一些有价值的计算思维测评方案。但高等教育界的计算思维教育多以融入式训练为主,对此尚未见到较为成熟的测评手段。研究发现现有测评工具不适于高校融入式计算思维训练,需要寻求与课程知识考核相联系的更实用的量化手段。只有将学习者在接受计算思维教育前后的计算思维水平进行对比,才能评价计算思维教育的成败。基于计算思维是学科思维,其发展从低到高要经历知识论、工具论、方法论、对策论四个层次的观点,提出了计算思维测评方案,给出了计算思维水平和迁移率量化公式,并把两者看作计算思维教学改革的重要依据。在某大学基于课程的计算思维教学实践中,通过两组学生对比,证明其教育活动取得了积极的效果。

关键词: 计算思维, 测试, 融入式计算思维训练, 计算思维水平, 迁移率

Abstract: After computational thinking was put forward,many countries and regions began to explore computational thinking instruction one after another.For the past years some valuable evaluation schemes for the separate computational thinking instrucion at the k-12 level were formed.But in higher education,most of the computational thinking instructions are infused instruction.As for the evaluation of this instructon,the mature evaluation tools or schemes are only a few.The research finds that some existing computational thinking assessment tools are not suitable for the infused thinking instruction of higher education.People need to seek more practical quantitative method associated to the assessment of the curriculum knowledge.Only by comparing the computational thinking level of learners before and after receiving education,can the effect of computational thinking education be evaluated.The paper is based on the viewpoint that computational thinking is a disciplined thinking,and its development needs to experience the four levels-knowlegement points,instrumentalism,methodology,and stratage-from low to high.This paper proposes a computational thinking assessment scheme and gives a quantitative formula for computational thinking level and migration rate.It regards them as the important basis of the computational thinking teaching reform.In the teaching practice of computational thinking based on courses in a university,it proves that education activities have achieved positive results through comparing the two groups of students.

Key words: computational thinking, test, infused computational thinking instruction, computational thinking level, migration rate

中图分类号:

TP301.5

史文崇, 刘茂华, 唐清. 高校融入式计算思维训练效果测试与分析[J]. 楚雄师范学院学报, 2020, 35(3): 125-131.

SHI Wenchong, LIU Maohua, TANG Qing. Testing and Analyzing the Effect of the Infused Computational Thinking Instruction in University[J]. Journal of Chuxiong Normal University, 2020, 35(3): 125-131.

参考文献

[1] Wing J M.Computational thinking[J].Communications of ACM,2006,49(3):33–35.
[2] 教育部高等学校大学计算机课程教学指导委员会.计算思维教学改革宣言[J].中国大学教学,2013,16(7):7–10.
Computer Curiculums’Teaching Guiding Committee of the Institutions of Higher Learning of the Ministry of Education.Manifesto on the teaching reformation of Computational Thinking[Z].Teaching in Chinese Colleges and Universities,2013,16(7):7–10.
[3] Valentina D,Futschek G.Bebras international contest on Informatics and computer literacy:criteria for good tasks[J].Informatics Education Supporting Computational Thinking,2008,59(7):19–30.
[4] Leon M J,Robles G &Roman M.Automatic analysis of scratch projects to assess and foster computational thinking[J].Revista de Educación a Distancia,2015,42(6):30–46.
[5] Korkmaz Ö,Cakir R &Ozden M Y.A validity and reliability study of the computational thinking scales (CTS)[J].Computers in Human Behavior,2017,22(9):10–32.
[6] Ioannidou A,Bennett V,Repenning A,Han K K.Computational thinking patterns[A].Procedings of the 2011 Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association[C].Washington:Columbia Press,2011:2028–2040.
[7] Gonzalez M R.Complementary tools for computational thinking assessment[A].Proceedings of International Conference on Computational Thinking Education[C],Lodon:Oxford University Press,2017:228–242.
[8] Brennan K,Resnick M.New frameworks for studying and assessing the development of computational thinking[A].Procedings of AERA 2012[C],Vancouver:BC Press,2012:1035–1051.
[9] Brasiel S,Close K,Soojeong J,et al.Measuring computational thinking development with the FUN Tool[J].Emerging Research,Practice and Policy on Education,2017,38(4):36–48.
[10] 史文崇.全球计算思维研究与实践综述[J].计算机工程与应用,2018,54(4):31–36.Shi W C.Summary of global reaearch and practice of computational thinking.Computer enginneering and applications,2018,54(4):31–35.
[11] 陈鹏,黄荣,怀梁跃,张进宝.如何培养计算思维[J].现代远程教育研究,2018,21(1):98–112.Chen P,Huang R,Huai L Y,et al.How to cultivate computational thinking[J].Research on Modern Distance Education,2018,21(1):98–112.
[12] Grover S,Pea R.Computational thinking in K-12:a review of the state of the field[J].Educational Researcher,2013,42(1):38–43.
[13] Sanford J F.Core concepts of computational thinking[J].International Journal of Teaching and Case Studies,2013,4(1):1–12.
[14] Czerkawski B C and Lyman E W.Exploring issues about computational thinking in higher education[J].Tech Trends,2015,59(2):57–67.
[15] 史文崇.思维的计算特征与计算的思维属性[J].计算机科学,2014,41(2):11–14.Shi W C.Computing features of thinking and thinking attributes of computing[J].Computer Science,2014,41(2):11–14.
[16] 祝智庭,李锋.面向学科思维的信息技术课程设计[J].电化教育研究,2015,33(1):20–26.Zhu Z T,Li F.Designing information technology curriculum orienting discipline thinking[J].Research on e-education,2015,33(1):20–26.
[17] 陈国良.计算思维的表述体系[J].中国大学教学,2013,16(12):22–26.Chen G L.Expressing system of computational thinking[J].Teaching in Chinese Colleges And Universities,2013,16(12):22–26.
[18] Yasar O,Veronesi P,Jose M,et al.Computational pedagogy:fostering a new method of teaching[J].Computers In Education Journal,2016,20(8):51–72.
[19] 史文崇.思维的计算特征与计算的思维属性[J].计算机科学,2014,41(2):11–14.Shi W C.Computing features of thinking &thinking attributes of computing[J].Computer Science,2014,41(2):11–14.
[20] Wing J M.Computational thinking[J].Communications of ACM,2006,49(3):33–35.
[21] 史文崇.计算思维进化规律研究[J].内蒙古大学学报,2017,22(3):75–82.Shi W C.On the evolution law of computational thinking[J].Journal of Inner Mongulia University,2017,22(3):75–82.
[22] Brennan K,Resnick M.New frameworks for studying and assessing the development of computational thinking[A].Procedings of AERA 2012[C].Vancouver:BC Press,2012:1035–1051.