楚雄师范学院学报 ›› 2026, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (4): 104-114.

• 管理学研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

“去指标化”:高校课堂教学评价的现实困境与范式转型

黄招霞1, 刘虹2, 刘向丽3   

  1. 1.南昌师范学院 教育教学评估中心,江西 南昌 330032;
    2.云南省教育科学研究院,云南 昆明 650000;
    3.南昌师范学院 马克思主义学院,江西 南昌 330032
  • 收稿日期:2026-03-27 出版日期:2026-07-20 发布日期:2026-09-07
  • 作者简介:黄招霞(1990–),女,南昌师范学院教育教学评估中心讲师,研究方向为高等教育管理;刘 虹(1984–),女,云南省教育科学研究院副研究员,研究方向为教育理论、高等教育。
  • 基金资助:
    江西省高等教育学会一般项目“数智赋能高校课堂教学质量评价的联动机理与样态重塑研究”(JX-D-114); 江西省高等学校教学改革研究一般课题“新文科背景下法学通识课多元融合式课程建设改革——以‘法学概论’课为例”(JXJG-22-23-31)

“De-Indicatorization: Realistic Dilemmas and Paradigm Shift in College and University Classroom Teaching Evaluation

Huang Zhaoxia1, Liu Hong2, Liu Xiangli3   

  1. 1. Center for Education Evaluation, Nanchang Normal University, Nanchang, Jiangxi Province 330032, China;
    2. Yunnan Academy of Educational Sciences, Kunming, Yunnan Province 650000, China;
    3. School of Marxism, Nanchang Normal University, Nanchang, Jiangxi Province 330032, China
  • Received:2026-03-27 Online:2026-07-20 Published:2026-09-07

摘要: 在高校课堂教学评价的长期实践中,量化指标一直处于评价体系的中心。基于管理学视角,“指标化”显著提升组织运作能力。但是在过度依赖量化评价的情况下,教师与教学行为容易在评价过程中失去话语表达与价值诠释的能力。而价值理性逐渐走向边缘化,评价活动与改进实践也脱节。为解决上述问题,解释主义重视情境协调性、证据多元性与协商对话性,为“去指标化”评价体系提供理论基础。专业共同体的内生支撑也能有效推进评价体系改革。为将价值理性落到实处,本文提出三条相辅相成的实践路径,分别为理念上的启蒙、方法工具箱的开发以及制度层面的保障。“去指标化”的评价范式能有效解决理论与行动之间的脱节问题,提升决策过程的生态合理性,增强多方利益相关者的参与感和认同感。在教育与管理领域,该范式超越工具理性的单向控制,兼具解释深度与操作灵活性,是一种实用的实践模式。

关键词: 去指标化, 高校课堂教学评价, 理论范式, 价值理性, 解释主义

Abstract: In college and university classroom teaching evaluation practice, quantitative indicators have long occupied the core position. “Indicatorization” can, from the management perspective, significantly improve organizational and operational capabilities. In an environment of over-reliance on quantitative evaluation, the teachers and their teaching behavior, however, are likely to lose the verbal expression and value interpretation abilities. As a result, value rationality is gradually marginalized and evaluation activities disconnected from improvement practice. In response to these issues, interpretivism, by emphasizing situational coordination, evidence diversity and deliberative dialogue, provides a theoretical support for the “de-indicatorized” evaluation system. The endogenous support of the professional communities can likewise effectively promote the reform of the evaluation system. To put value rationality into practice, this article puts forward three complementary practical paths: conceptual enlightenment, development of methodological toolkits and institutional guarantees. A “de-indicatorized” evaluation paradigm can effectively resolve the disconnection between theory and action, improve the ecological rationality of the decision-making process, and enhance the sense of participation and identity of diverse stakeholders. In the field of education and management, this paradigm transcends the one-way control of instrumental rationality and combines the depth of interpretation with flexibility of operation to become an operable application model.

Key words: de-indicatorization, college and university classroom teaching evaluation, theoretical paradigm, value rationality, interpretivism

中图分类号: