参与者与旁观者：学生冲突场景下风险偏好选择差异实验研究

楚雄师范学院学报 ›› 2023, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (4): 69-76.

参与者与旁观者：学生冲突场景下风险偏好选择差异实验研究

王振辉¹, 贺辛²

1.西南交通大学公共管理学院,四川成都 610031;
2.中国电子科技集团公司第九研究所,四川绵阳 621000

收稿日期:2023-05-03 出版日期:2023-07-20 发布日期:2023-09-22
作者简介:王振辉（1966–）,女,管理学博士,西南交通大学公共管理学院副教授,研究方向为社会风险与社会治理。

Participants and Bystanders: An Experimental Study on the Differences of Students' Risk Preference Choices in Conflict Situations

WANG Zhenhui¹, HE Xin²

1. School of Public Administration, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu, Sichuan Province 610031;
2. The Ninth Research Institute, China Electronics Technology Corporation, Mianyang, Sichuan Province 621000

Received:2023-05-03 Online:2023-07-20 Published:2023-09-22

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 近年来校园暴力问题一直是学界研究的热点,鲜见有深入探究学生冲突行为背后逻辑的研究,本文将基于框架效应分析学生出现冒险行为的缘由。在校园冲突情景下,事件中的角色和性别对学生的风险偏好具有交互影响。参与主体往往比围观者更加具有冒险倾向,且男生会因为信息属性的差异而呈现出相反的风险决策,而女生则一直在情景中表现出较高的冒险倾向。通过分析学生可能的行为偏好,在此基础上优化校园安全教育的方式,有利于增加校园风险沟通的有效性。

关键词: 参与者, 旁观者, 风险偏好, 框架效应

Abstract: In recent years, campus violence has been a focus of academic research, but deep exploration of the logic of the students' behavior in conflicts is scarce. This paper, based on framing effect, analyzes the reasons why students take risks. The study finds that, in the context of campus conflict, the role and gender in the event have an interactive impact on the students' risk preference. Participants tend to be more adventurous than onlookers, and boys show opposite risk decisions due to differences in information properties, while girls always show a higher risk tendency in the situation. By exploring and analyzing the students' possible behavior preferences, we can optimize the way of campus safety education, which is conducive to increasing the effectiveness of campus risk communication.

Key words: participant, bystander, risk appetite, framing effect

中图分类号:

王振辉, 贺辛. 参与者与旁观者：学生冲突场景下风险偏好选择差异实验研究[J]. 楚雄师范学院学报, 2023, 38(4): 69-76.

WANG Zhenhui, HE Xin. Participants and Bystanders: An Experimental Study on the Differences of Students' Risk Preference Choices in Conflict Situations[J]. Journal of Chuxiong Normal University, 2023, 38(4): 69-76.