楚雄师范学院学报 ›› 2022, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (4): 32-38.

• 语言文学研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

萧统《文选》不录《答繁钦书》之因探析——以《顾随讲〈文选〉》为中心

王贝贝   

  1. 河南大学 文学院,河南 开封 475001
  • 收稿日期:2022-05-10 出版日期:2022-07-20 发布日期:2022-08-16
  • 作者简介:王贝贝(1996–),女,河南大学文学院硕士研究生,研究方向为汉魏六朝文学。

On Reasons for Exclusion of Reply to Fan Qin from Selected Prose by Xiao Tong-Centering around Selected Prose of Gu Suijiang

WANG Beibei   

  1. College of Chinese Language and Literature, Henan University, Kaifeng, Henan Province 475001
  • Received:2022-05-10 Online:2022-07-20 Published:2022-08-16

摘要: 《文选》的选录标准问题一直是文选学研究的热点话题,探讨《文选》的选录标准有利于更好地了解萧统其人和他所处的那个时代;对《文选》选录的具体篇目进行分析,有助于更具体深入地分析《文选》的选录标准。探究《文选》选录繁钦的《与魏文帝笺》却不录文帝之回书《答繁钦书》的原因,进而把《答繁钦书》与曹丕被选录的作品《与吴质书》进行对比,我们便不难看出萧统的选录标准倾向于具有文人气、丽而不浮、典而不野及有情操的作品。

关键词: 《文选》, 选录标准, 《顾随讲〈文选〉》, 《答繁钦书》

Abstract: The selection criteria of Selected Prose have always been a topic in this field and discussions on them can help us better understand Xiao Tong and his time. An analysis of the titles included in Selected Prose can shed some light on the criteria for their inclusion on both specific and profound bases. By exploring the reasons why Fan Qin’s Letter to Emperor Wen of Wei is included in stead of Reply to Fan Qin of Emperor Wen and comparing the latter with another included work of Cao Pi the same emperor-Letter to Wu Zhi, it can be seen that works rich in refined scholarly sentiment, beautiful but not boastful in style and using classic allusions instead of hearsay are preferred by Xiao Tong the compiler.

Key words: Selected Prose, inclusion criterion, Selected Prose of Gu Suijiang, Reply to Fan Qin

中图分类号: