楚雄师范学院学报 ›› 2026, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (2): 134-142.

• 管理学研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

党的自我革命制度规范体系的事实性与价值性:逻辑关系与实践路径

吕颖, 刘智杰   

  1. 昆明理工大学 马克思主义学院,云南 昆明 650500
  • 收稿日期:2025-12-17 出版日期:2026-03-20 发布日期:2026-04-29
  • 作者简介:吕颖(1985–),男,法学博士,昆明理工大学马克思主义学院副教授,研究方向为马克思主义理论。
  • 基金资助:
    中国高等教育学会2025年度高等教育科学研究规划课题“教育强国战略下马克思主义理论人才培养破壁进路研究”(25MK0303); 昆明理工大学人才培养项目“人类文明新形态下云南民族‘直过区'家庭家教家风建设研究”(CA2416M242A)

The Factual and Value-Based Dimensions of the Institutional Normative System for the Party's Self-Revolution: Logical Relationships and Practical Pathways

Lü Ying, Liu Zhijie   

  1. School of Marxism, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming, Yunnan Province 650500, China
  • Received:2025-12-17 Online:2026-03-20 Published:2026-04-29

摘要: 无论从党员个体还是从组织整体出发,完善党的自我革命制度规范体系的基本问题涉及个体与集体之间行动能力的紧张关系,这种紧张源于“自主决定”与“他主决定”的矛盾关系。“自主决定”基于内在自愿性,源于价值性;“他主决定”受外在强制性制约,服从于事实性。从事实性层面看,党的自我革命制度规范体系演进遵循“理念–制度–操作”的下沉运动,回应“实然”问题。从价值性诉求看,该制度规范体系有“规制性–规范性–文化认知性”三层递进维度的上升运动,回应“应然”问题。这两种运动在“自主决定”与“他主决定”上呈现出对立性和统一性,如何实现它们之间的动态平衡,是新时代党的建设的核心命题。

关键词: 中国共产党, 自我革命制度规范体系, 事实性, 价值性

Abstract: Viewed from the perspective of either individual Party members or the Party as an organization in general, the crux of the issue in refining the institutional normative system for the Party's self-revolution involves the tension between the individual members and the collective body, the tension that stems from the contradictory relationship between “autonomous decision-making” and “heteronomous decision-making.” The former is grounded in intrinsic voluntariness and derives from value-based principles while the latter, in contrast, is constrained by external coercion and subsumed to factual imperatives. From a factual perspective, the institutional normative system for the Party's self-revolution, which responses to questions of fact, evolves through a downward movement of “ideology-institution-operation.” From the standpoint of value-based aspirations, this framework, which responses to questions of necessity, ascends through three progressive dimensions: regulatory, normative, and cultural-cognitive. These two movements exhibit both antagonism and unity in the dynamics of “autonomous decision-making” and “heteronomous decision-making.” In advancing the institutional framework for the Party's self-revolution, achieving a dynamic equilibrium between empirical and value-based approaches constitutes the core proposition of Party building in the new era.

Key words: the Communist Party of China (CPC), institutional normative system for the Party's self-revolution, factuality, value-basedness

中图分类号: