楚雄师范学院学报 ›› 2025, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (4): 154-160.

• 管理学研究 • 上一篇    

“一村一法官”:M县基层法院能动履职机制的创新实践

耿尚勋   

  1. 楚雄师范学院 管理与经济学院,云南 楚雄 675000
  • 收稿日期:2025-04-22 出版日期:2025-07-20 发布日期:2025-09-09
  • 作者简介:耿尚勋(1980–),男,楚雄师范学院管理与经济学院讲师,研究方向为统计检验、基层社会治理。
  • 基金资助:
    云南省哲学社会科学规划社会智库项目“云南省绿色硅向精深加工和终端制造延伸对策研究”(SHZK2022305)

“One Village, One Judge”: An Innovative Practice of the Proactive Judicial Engagement Mechanism in the Grassroots Courts of M County

GENG Shangxun   

  1. School of Management and Economics, Chuxiong Normal University, Chuxiong, Yunnan Province 675000
  • Received:2025-04-22 Online:2025-07-20 Published:2025-09-09

摘要: 在“全过程人民民主”与“诉源治理”背景下,基层法院职能加速从被动裁判向能动履职转型。本文基于2022―2024年M县人民法院的实证数据,以“一村一法官”机制为案例,运用文献分析与实证研究方法,构建“问题精准识别-资源深度下沉-多元协同共治-法治生态重塑”四阶闭环治理模型,剖析其制度逻辑与实践路径。研究发现,该机制有效促进了司法服务下沉、纠纷前端化解与法治认同提升,但在机制嵌入深度、协同效率与群众参与方面仍存不足。据此提出“四方联动通报机制”“数字化预警工具”“无讼驿站”等优化路径,为基层法院推进嵌入式治理提供了制度参考。

关键词: 一村一法官, 基层法院, 能动履职

Abstract: Against the background of “whole-process people's democracy” and “source governance of litigation,” the functional role of grassroots courts is rapidly shifting from passive adjudication to proactive judicial engagement. Based on empirical data from the People's Court of M County, Yunnan Province (2022—2024), this paper takes the “One Village, One Judge” mechanism as the object for a case study. By employing literature analysis and empirical research methods, it constructs a four-stage closed-loop governance model–precise problem identification, deep resource deployment, multi-party collaborative co-governance, and reconstruction of the rule-of-law ecosystem–to analyze the institutional logic and practical pathways of this mechanism. The study finds that this mechanism effectively facilitates the extension of judicial services to the grassroots level, the pre-litigation resolution of disputes, and the enhancement of legal awareness. However, it has also identified a number of shortcomings, such as the depth of institutional integration, the efficiency of coordination and public participation. In light of this, it proposes optimization strategies such as a “four-party joint reporting mechanism,” “digital early warning tools,” and “non-litigation service stations” to provide institutional references for promoting embedded governance in grassroots courts.

Key words: One Village,One Judge, grassroots court, proactive judicial engagement

中图分类号: