认知特征视野下的“玄学”——道家激进的具身认知观

楚雄师范学院学报 ›› 2021, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (2): 62-71.

认知特征视野下的“玄学”——道家激进的具身认知观

尹可丽¹, 杨阳²

1.云南师范大学教育学部,云南昆明 650500;
2.保山中医药高等专科学校人文与管理学院,云南保山 678000

收稿日期:2020-09-01 出版日期:2021-03-20 发布日期:2021-05-28
作者简介:尹可丽（1969–）,女,云南师范大学教育学部心理学系教授,博士生导师,研究方向为民族心理学和文化心理学。

The “Metaphysics” in the View of Cognition Characteristics— On the Taoist Radical Embodied Cognition

YIN Keli¹, YANG Yang²

1. Faculty of Education, Yunnan Normal University, Kunming, Yunnan Province 650500;
2. School of Humanities and Management, Baoshan College of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Baoshan,Yunnan Province 678000

Received:2020-09-01 Online:2021-03-20 Published:2021-05-28

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 中国古代儒道思想的体知是中国古代心理学思想的具身认知,但儒道思想历来存在分歧。以表征、运算特征为线索,融合现象学视角可诠释儒、道具身认知之差异,澄清儒家是“温和派”,道家是“激进派”;对道家主要的“玄”范畴——“道”“气”“势”“象”作“激进”心理学化的解读,进而与西方激进具身认知进行比较,力图全面展现道家激进具身认知的特点及其独特贡献。

关键词: 道家思想, 激进具身认知, 纯粹体知, "象思维"

Abstract: The embodiment in ancient Chinese Confucianism and Taoism is embodied cognition in ancient Chinese psychological thought. However, Confucianism and Taoism have never agreed to each other. Taking representations and computation characteristics as clues, the authors first explain the differences between embodied cognition of Confucianism and that of Taoism before clarifying that the Confucian embodied cognition belongs to the “moderate school” while the Taoist embodied cognition belongs to the “radical school” from the phenomenological perspective. Likewise, the authors present their psychological interpretation as to why the major Taoist “metaphysics” categories–Tao, Qi, Shi, Xiang–are “radical” by taking the characteristics of representations and computations as clues from the perspective of phenomenology so as to compare them with Western radical embodied cognition. In addition, the Taoist views of emotions and the emotional views of radical enactivism could also be dialogue. This article tries to fully illustrate the characteristics and unique contributions of Taoist radical embodied cognition, so as to open up new vision for Taoism research in the psychological field and promote research on development of embodied cognition in China.

Key words: Taoism, radical embodied cognition, pure embodiment, "image thinking"

中图分类号:

B223

尹可丽, 杨阳. 认知特征视野下的“玄学”——道家激进的具身认知观[J]. 楚雄师范学院学报, 2021, 36(2): 62-71.

YIN Keli, YANG Yang. The “Metaphysics” in the View of Cognition Characteristics— On the Taoist Radical Embodied Cognition[J]. Journal of Chuxiong Normal University, 2021, 36(2): 62-71.

参考文献

[1] Mahon B Z.The burden of embodied cognition[J].Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology = Revue canadienne de Psychologie experimentale,2015,69(2):172–178.
[2] 叶浩生,麻彦坤,杨文登.身体与认知表征:见解与分歧[J].心理学报,2018,50(4):462–472.
[3] 黎晓丹,叶浩生.中国古代儒道思想中的具身认知观[J].心理学报,2015,47(5):702–710.
[4] 景怀斌.德性认知的心理机制与启示[J].中国社会科学,2015(9):182–202.
[5] 刘志斌,高申春.具身认知观的身体样态分析[J].心理学探新,2017,37(1):3–7.
[6] 韩冬,叶浩生.认知的身体依赖性:从符号加工到具身认知[J].心理学探新,2013,33(4):291–296.
[7] Glenberg A M.Embodiment as a unifying perspective for psychology[J].Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Cognitive Science,2010,1(4):586–596.
[8] 胡万年,叶浩生.中国心理学界具身认知研究进展[J].自然辩证法通讯,2013,35(6):111–115+124+128.
[9] 李荣荣,麻彦坤,叶浩生.具身的情绪:情绪研究的新范式[J].心理科学,2012,35(3):754–759.
[10] Merleau-Ponty.Phenomenology of Perception[J].Science,2013,201(4359):17–20.
[11] 易仲怡,杨文登.温和具身认知的产生与发展[J].心理研究,2018,11(2):106–112.
[12] 郑皓元,叶浩生,苏得权.有关具身认知的三种理论模型[J].心理学探新,2017,37(3):195–199.
[13] 叶浩生.“具身”涵义的理论辨析[J].心理学报,2014,46(7):1032–1042.
[14] Barsalou L W.On Staying Grounded and Avoiding Quixotic Dead Ends[J].Psychonomic Bulletin &Review,2016,23(4):1122–1142.
[15] 李恒威,肖家燕.认知的具身观[J].自然辩证法通讯,2006,28(1):29–34.
[16] Shanton K,Goldman A.Simulation Theory[J].Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Cognitive Science,2010,1(4):527–538.
[17] 王树人.中西比较视野下的“象思维”——回归原创之思[J].文史哲,2004(6):108–114.
[18] Dempsey L P,Shani I.Three misconceptions concerning strong embodiment[J].Phenomenology &the Cognitive Sciences,2015,14(4):827–849.
[19] Wilson A D,Golonka S.Embodied Cognition Is Not What You Think It Is[J].Frontiers in Psychology,2013,4(58):1–13.
[20] Barandiaran X E.Autonomy and Enactivism:Towards a Theory of Sensorimotor Autonomous Agency[J].Topoi,2016,(34):1–22.
[21] 叶浩生,杨文登.激进生成论及其反表征主义革命[J].心理学探新,2018,38(1):3–8.
[22] Dove G.Three symbol ungrounding problems:Abstract concepts and the future of embodied cognition[J].Psychonomic Bulletin &Review,2016,23(4):1109–1121.
[23] Gelder T V.What might cognition be,if not computation?[J].The Journal of Philosophy,1995,92(7):345–381.
[24] Jesus P D,Daniel D.Hutto and Erik Myin:Radicalizing Enactivism:Basic Minds without Content[J].Cognitive Computation,2015,7(3):392–396.
[25] Shapiro L A.Radicalizing Enactivism:Basic Minds without Content,by Daniel D.Hutto and Erik Myin[J].Mind,2014,123(489):213–220.
[26] Thompson E,Varela F J.Radical embodiment:neural dynamics and consciousness[J].Trends in Cognitive Sciences,2001,5(10):418–425.
[27] Fenici M.Radicalizing Enactivism:Basic Minds without Content[J].Philosophical Psychology,2012,28(2):240.
[28] 陈鼓应.老子与孔子思想比较研究[J].哲学研究,1989(8):30–40.
[29] 高海波.《老子》“道可道”的一种新的可能诠释[J].中国哲学史,2015(3):56–63.
[30] 叶浩生.中国古代道家责任心理思想及其现代意义[J].南京师大学报社会科学版,2010(3):105–110.
[31] 景怀斌.儒家思想对于现代心理咨询的启示[J].心理学报,2007,39(2):371–380.
[32] 杨国荣.体道与成人——《庄子》视域中的真人与真知[J].文史哲,2006(5):125–135.
[33] 冯建国,申荷永,刘晓明.论直接深入无意识的积极想象与内视方法——兼论作为单纯觉察的意识[J].心理科学,2010(1):238–240.
[34] 丁原明.老子的生存哲学[J].哲学研究,2003(3):40–45.
[35] 那薇.道家的返朴归真和海德格尔的本真存在[J].中国哲学史,2003(2):114–121.
[36] 张祥龙.海德格尔思想与中国天道:终极视域的开启与交融(修订第3版)[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2011.
[37] 那薇.在心物交流互动中生成的老庄之道[M].北京:北京燕山出版社,2009.
[38] 罗传芳.老子生存论哲学辩证发微[J].哲学研究,2005(2):72–78.
[39] 罗传芳.老子哲学的生存论特征及与儒家的分判[J].哲学研究,2017(1):40–45.
[40] 蒋丽梅.物我感通,无为任化——庄子“物化”思想研究[J].中国哲学史,2015(3):64–68.
[41] 刘笑敢.老子之自然与无为概念新诠[J].中国社会科学,1996(6):136–149.
[42] 张祥龙.有无之辨和对老子道的偏斜——从郭店楚简《老子》甲本“天下之物生于有/无”章谈起[J].中国哲学史,2010(3):63–70.
[43] 王树人.中国象思维与西方概念思维之比较[J].学术研究,2004(10):5–15.
[44] 王树人.中国哲学与文化之根——“象”与“象思维”引论[J].河北学刊,2007,27(5):21–25.
[45] 王树人.象思维视野下的《齐物论》[J].中国社会科学院研究生院学报,2005(1):99–108.
[46] 那薇.道家的直觉与现代精神[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,1994.
[47] 何群群,丁道群.马斯洛人本主义心理学与中国道家思想[J].心理学探新,2007,27(1):8–11.
[48] (美)亚伯拉罕•马斯洛.人性能达到的境界[M].曹晓慧等,译.北京:世界图书北京出版公司,2014.
[49] 贾蕙萱,康成俊.森田疗法:医治心理障碍的良方[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,2010.